Defining a clear value proposition to boost sales

User research

Iterations

Sales

Bookings

Overview

Context

Lastminute.com offers travelers the opportunity to make their flight dates flexible in case their plans change. In response to the sustained demand for flexibility after the pandemic, our goal was to adapt our flexible fare trip add-on so it's value resonates with travelers.

Role

Lead designer and researcher covering the end-to-end design process. Collaborated with a PM, content design, my lead researcher, and a team of 10 engineers.

Date

2023 - 2024

Problem

The current design of the flexible product gives an incomplete and misleading overview of the benefits we offer to travelers. How might we design the content so the value proposition is clear and resonates with travelers who value flexibility?

Goals

Increase sales

Increase checkout conversion

Unify experiences across devices

Clarify value proposition

Increase sales

Increase checkout conversion

Clarify value proposition

Unify experiences across devices

Impact

+ 14%

Sales on desktop

+ 8%

Sales on meta traffic

+ 4%

Conversion rate, all devices

-30%

Errors in usability testing

+ 14%

Sales on desktop

+ 8%

Sales on meta traffic

Metrics for a checkout reaching 5M+ monthly users

How we got there

Design process

This project is a reflection of a real-world design process. It's anything but linear, starting with some understanding, then iterating, working on research and design in parallel, and pivoting as we learned. I loved every second of it.

Flexible fares are famous within the product org at lastminute.com for having achieved unprecedented AB test results in the past, only to remain untouched for years after for fear of damaging performance. For this reason, we decided to start small by modifying the UI only, in order to buy ourselves time to do user research.

My first research priority was to understand travelers' motivations for booking with flexibility. From there, I took an iterative approach to designing and testing new versions of the content in order to measure success. After four rounds of testing a design achieved through collaborative design, we went live with the latest version whose performance exceeded our expectations. See the impact section for some results, and dive into the full process if you're curious for more.

Read the full process

Design process

This project is a reflection of a real-world design process. It's anything but linear, starting with some understanding, then iterating, working on research and design in parallel, and pivoting as we learned. I loved every second of it.

Flexible fares are famous within the product org at lastminute.com for having achieved unprecedented AB test results in the past, only to remain untouched for years after for fear of damaging performance. For this reason, we decided to start small by modifying the UI only, in order to buy ourselves time to do user research.

My first research priority was to understand travelers' motivations for booking with flexibility. From there, I took an iterative approach to designing and testing new versions of the content in order to measure success. After four rounds of testing a design achieved through collaborative design, we went live with the latest version whose performance exceeded our expectations. See the impact section for some results, and dive into the full process if you're curious for more.

Read the full process

Solution

Content-driven design

I learned from user testing the original content that users would benefit from more information on the benefits and fees associated with each fare. Some even suggested that the lack of clarity would deter them from purchasing our preferred fare - a big red flag.

With a clear problem to solve, I focused on creating a simple design that would be easy to read and build upon as we iterate.

Hypothesis #1: users will feel supported with longer descriptions

Flexibility as the main value proposition

During user research, I learned that travelers tend to look for flexibility if they are uncertain about their dates but still want to book, and are happy to spend more now to get peace of mind. Travelers who typically choose basic are the opposite; they are confident of their travel dates and want to avoid paying for any extra trip add-ons they likely won't use.

Hypothesis #2: copy should be written to match travelers' preferences.

Support travelers with more info

Provide more supporting information

Travelers can find more information by tapping "get to know our fares," which opens a modal with more details about the benefits and fees associate with each fare. I organized the content by benefit and collapsed information in accordions to make the modal easy to navigate.

In testing, users suggested extra information would be useful, and in later iterations relied on this area to resolve any doubts.

In testing, users suggested extra information would be useful, and in later iterations relied on this area to resolve any doubts.

Reflection

What I learned

The original version of this trip add-on was a clear example of our poor collaboration with legal. The constraints in place at the time were defined in a way that prevented my team from iterating for longer than I'm happy to admit. In order to move forward with this redesign, we knew we had to change our approach to working with legal. We reached an agreement to go for a guideline-driven approach, prioritizing clarity demonstrated through user research rather than simply using copy provided by legal.

©2023 by Nadia Zunarelli